Archive for October, 2006

10.10.06

Election and Limited Atonement: Resting in God’s Grace

Posted in Uncategorized at 10:53 pm by Perry

Election and Limited Atonement:
Resting in God’s Glory and Grace

Recent I had the opportunity to engage in a discussion over my favorite topic of conversation, the sovereignty of God.  The discussion arose during the bible study that I am currently leading with Bobby Fleck this past week when only one person came who was interested in discussing this issue.  Both Bobby and I are reformed Calvinists who hold firmly to all five point whereas the other member of this discussion, a dear friend, is defiantly not reformed and had serious issues with the reformed doctrines.  The substance of that discussion drove me to outline a brief teaching on the doctrines of election and limited atonement as they are taught by the scriptures for the glory of God Almighty.  May this teaching be humble and edifying to the Lord of Hosts.
______________________________________________________________________________
Note: To do a serious study of scripture it is necessary to use a literal translation of the scriptures, preferably either the English Standard Version (ESV), New American Standard Bible (NASB), King James Version (KJV) or New King James Version (NKJV) for those who don’t speak old English.  Translations such as the New International Version (NIV), Today’s New Internal Version (TNIV), New Century Version (NCV), New Living Translation (NLT) or the Message are either paraphrase or thought-for-thought translations which are not conducive to the expositional study of scripture.  As such I will be using the English Standard Version.
______________________________________________________________________________
The Doctrine of Election
To “elect” means to choose or select whereas to be “elected” means by extension to be chosen or selected by someone or something.  The Christian doctrine of election teaches that God Himself is the one who elects (or chooses) those people who will be saved to inherit salvation.  Given that not all peoples are saved, if God is the one who elects those to salvation He must also be the one who elects those who are not saved to in fact never become saved.  The point is that God is the one who chooses the believer to inherit faith and salvation instead of the conventional belief held by most Christians that it is the believer who, upon their own free will, chooses to accept God’s offer of salvation which is only offered by never forced.
Election is not a doctrine that arose from the wisdom of man but instead is the teaching of scripture itself.  I would like to examine some verses of scripture to show that the holy scriptures do in fact teach that God is the one who elects.

Ephesians 1:3-12
Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places,  4  even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love  5  he predestined us for adoption through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will,  6  to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved.  7  In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace,  8  which he lavished upon us, in all wisdom and insight  9  making known to us the mystery of his will, according to his purpose, which he set forth in Christ  10  as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth.  11  In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will,  12  so that we who were the first to hope in Christ might be to the praise of his glory.

From these verses from the Apostle Paul there are many things to be learned concerning the doctrine of election.  Verse 4 teaches us that He (being God) chose us in Him before the foundation of the world.  What is to be learned is that our salvation was secured not only before we were born but before the world was even brought into existence before the idea of free will was even constructed.  Verse 5 reinforces that we were predestined for adoption according to God’s will and not our own meaning that it is not from our will that our salvation comes but from the will and action of God through the work of Jesus Christ’s sacrifice.  Verse 9 shows us that God’s will is made known to us which is Jesus Christ through whom we receive salvation meaning that God is the one who makes our salvation known to us and not us who comes to know of how to receive salvation.  Finally, verse 11 again reinforces that the inheritance we have obtained which is our salvation in the Lord came from our predestination according to God’s purpose who what?  Who works all things according to His will meaning that God is the one who wills us to be saved and God is the one who carries our the process of us obtaining our salvation.

Romans 8:28-33
28And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.  29  For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.  30  And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.  31  What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?  32  He who did not spare his own Son but gave him up for us all, how will he not also with him graciously give us all things?  33  Who shall bring any charge against God’s elect? It is God who justifies.

These verses from the letter to the Romans are so eloquent and yet so profound in regards to teaching on the doctrine of God’s sovereign election.  Verse 29 teaches that those whom He (God) foreknew he conformed to the image of His son.  To foreknow means to know something before sometime which, when taking in the context of the following verses, means to know who would be saved before the time that we would be saved.  Now, some would argue that God can know who would be saved by looking down the corridors of time and seeing who would accept Him but that is not what scripture is teaching here.  The verse is teaching that not only did God know but he conformed meaning he did the work to make those who become saved into the image of His Son through whom we receive salvation, Amen!  Verse 30 continues by saying that those whom God foreknew before time, he predestined, and those whom he predestined he called, and those whom He called he Justified and those whom He justified by also glorified.  Here we see the beautiful picture of how salvation comes to the believer.  Before time God knew who would be saved but He didn’t only know be seeing or learning of who would accept Him, he knew because He was the one who called us unto salvation and He was the one who justified us when re received the salvation He gave us.  The language is active on God’s part teaching that He is the one doing all of the work and that the one who is being predestined, called, and justified is playing the passive role of receiving the work of salvation done completely by God Himself.

2 Thessalonians 2:13-14 
13But we ought always to give thanks to God for you, brothers beloved by the Lord, because God chose you as the first fruits to be saved, through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth.  14  To this he called you through our gospel, so that you may obtain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Who does the choosing?  God is the one who chooses us.  Scripture unabashedly teaches that God is the one who chooses those to be saved.  Again, in verse 14 we see that God is the one who called us through the gospel so that we could attain salvation through faith in the Lord of all creation Jesus the Christ.

Romans 3:11-18
18 no one understands; no one seeks for God.  12  All have turned aside; together they have become worthless; no one does good, not even one.”  13  “Their throat is an open grave; they use their tongues to deceive.” “The venom of asps is under their lips.”  14  “Their mouth is full of curses and bitterness.”  15  “Their feet are swift to shed blood;  16  in their paths are ruin and misery,  17  and the way of peace they have not known.”,  18  “There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

I will be concise because the teaching here is concise yet profound.  Verse 13 teaches us that NO ONE seeks for god and that ALL  have turned aside becoming WORTHLESS.  How can anyone in such a state come to God or have anything to offer God?  If NO ONE comes to God then how can anyone chose to inherit salvation by their free will?  Clearly, God has to be the one who works fully in us to enable us to receive the work of salvation as ALL have turned away from Him and fail to ever seek Him on their own.

I have outlined only three verses here which teach clearly the doctrine of election from the scriptures.  This truth of scripture, though, is not limited to these four verses but instead the scriptures are rich in this teaching throughout both the old and new testament.  The following are additional verses to cite in the study of God’s sovereign election from the scriptures:

Genesis 18:17-19,
Deuteronomy 4:35-38, 7:6-8, 10:14-15, 14:2, 18:4-5,
1 Chronicles 28:4,
Psalms 33:12, 65:4, 78:67-71, 100:3, 105:6, 135:4,
Ezekiel 16:16
Isaiah 40:23, 41:8, 44:1-2, 45:4, 65:9
Jeremiah 1:5, 17:9, 27:5, 31:35-36
Matthew 11:25-27, 20:15, 22:14, 24:24, 24:31, 7:21-23, 13:20
Mark 13:20
Luke 6:45, 18:7,
John 1:4-5, 5:21, 6:37, 6:65, 8:43-44, 10:11-27, 13:18, 15:16, 15:19, 17:9
Acts 9:15, 13:48, 16:14, 22:14, 10:41
Romans 7:5, 8:29-8:33, 9:11-13, 9:23, 11:5-7, 11:28, 13:1, 16:13
1 Corinthians 1:26-27
Galatians 5:17
Ephesians 1:3-14, 2:4-10
1 Thessalonians 1:4
2 Thessalonians 2:13-14
2 Timothy 1:8-11, 2:10, 5:21
Titus 1:1
James 2:5
1 Peter 1:1-5, 1:20, 2:4-10
2 Peter 1:10
2 John 1:13
Revelation 13:8, 17:8

The Doctrine of Limited Atonement
Atonement is defined as the reconciliation between God and humans made possible through the sacrificial death and victorious resurrection of Jesus the Christ.  Limited atonement simply means then that the number of people who will be reconciled to God is effectively limited by God Himself.  You cannot separate the discussion of election from that of limited atonement so I would like to show how this doctrine arises from scripture itself.  Before preceding, I would like to offer a change in thinking.  Instead of approaching limited atonement as God limiting the number who would be saved I would encourage you to instead focus on the fact that God even saves one of us who are by nature sinners and of no value to Him is in itself compelling beyond degree showing His love, mercy, grace, and power.

Again, in the same format I will offer only three texts of scripture that outline this teaching with brief commentary along with many additional verses for independent study since one of the verses is quite long.

Romans 9:6:-24
24  But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel,  7  and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.”  8  This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.  9  For this is what the promise said: “About this time next year I will return and Sarah shall have a son.”  10  And not only so, but also when Rebecca had conceived children by one man, our forefather Isaac,  11  though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad–in order that God’s purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of his call–  12  she was told, “The older will serve the younger.”  13  As it is written, “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”  14  What shall we say then? Is there injustice on God’s part? By no means!  15  For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.”  16  So then it depends not on human will or exertion, but on God, who has mercy.  17  For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.”  18  So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills.  19  You will say to me then, “Why does he still find fault? For who can resist his will?”  20  But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, “Why have you made me like this?”  21  Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honored use and another for dishonorable use?  22  What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction,  23  in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory–  24  even us whom he has called, not from the Jews only but also from the Gentiles?

This is a large chunk of scripture so I will try and be brief on the points from this passage.  The passage starts with a discussion of God’s covenant with Abraham and the reference to the verse of Genesis where God states “Jacob have I loved, but Esau I have hated” in verse 13.  Here we see an OT example of God’s differential love between two people before they were even born.  The question we ask ourselves is, how can God be just in this, in explicitly choosing some to be saved and some not to be saved?  Paul deals with this is verse 14 when he asks if there can be found any injustice in God to which he definitively answers no!  As God said to Moses, “I will have mercy on who I will have mercy and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion”.  God is the one who chooses to whom he will show mercy and compassion and He is just in choosing some to whom He purposely chooses not to show mercy and compassion.  As Paul addresses in 19, we ask then how can God find fault in us and still condemn us when only He can save and He purposely chooses to save some but not others?  Paul’s answer is profound in stating that how can we as human’s possibly raise our fists at God and question Him when He is all that is pure and holy and we are weak and lost in our trespasses after falling from a state of living in God’s grace in the garden.  Paul extends the argument in verse 21 that God is just to make from one substance some for good use (salvation) and others dishonorable use (disobedience to God without salvation).  Finally, and most importantly, in verses 22 and 23 the point is made that for God to even show mercy on one person from all time with patience enduring us while we were in our sin apart from Him He is completely just.  The thinking we have is that God is unjust because He chooses some to be condemned but this thinking can only come from the idea that we have something to offer God to which He is obligated or obliged to act upon.  The truth is that we are worthless to God as we saw in Romans 3 and that we can offer nothing to Him and for Him to save one person is a sign of His grace, love, and power.  Paul reminds us in verse 23 that we must not lose focus of that, that God’s work of salvation is for His glory, not ours!
1 Peter 2:6-8
6 For it stands in Scripture: “Behold, I am laying in Zion a stone, a cornerstone chosen and precious, and whoever believes in him will not be put to shame.”  7  So the honor is for you who believe, but for those who do not believe, “The stone that the builders rejected has become the cornerstone,”  8  and “A stone of stumbling, and a rock of offense.” They stumble because they disobey the word, as they were destined to do.

Who lays the cornerstone that is a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense?  God says that He is the one who lays the cornerstone who is Christ Jesus.  And why do those who disobey the word stumble over the Lord Jesus Christ?  It is because they were destined by God Almighty to do so.  The do not stumble over the cornerstone because they choose to do so.  They continually will fall from the Christ who is Jesus because God Himself appointed them to do so that His glory would be manifested among those whom he had chosen as we saw earlier in Romans 9:23.

Jude 1:4 
4For certain people have crept in unnoticed who long ago were designated for this condemnation, ungodly people, who pervert the grace of our God into sensuality and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.

Again, the point is being made that those who are ungodly, those who pervert the gospel of truth were designated for condemnation meaning that they are set aside for destruction and condemnation by God for eternal punishment in hell.

The following are additional texts to cite in your study of the doctrine of limited atonement from the scriptures:

Exodus 7:3, 9:16
Deuteronomy 29:4
Joshua 11:20
1 Sam. 15:3
1 Kings 20:42
Job 12:24-25, 21:30
Proverbs 16:4, 31:8
Isaiah 6:9-10, 41:9, 44:21-24, 45:9, 53:8-12
Daniel 9:24
Habakkuk 1:12
Matthew 11:25, 13:13-15, 20:28
Luke 4:25-29
John 9:39, 10:11-15, 10:26, 11:51-52, 12:39-40, 17:2
Acts 4:27-28
Romans 5:11, 5:15, 8:33-34, 9:18, 9:21-22
2 Corinthians 3:13-15, 4:3-4, 5:21
Ephesians 5:25
1 Thessalonians 5:9
Hebrews 2:10, 2:14-15, 9:12, 9:28
James 1:18
1 Peter 2:8, 2:21
2 Peter 2:12
Jude 1:4

I think the issue that causes so much conflict for those people who so adamantly deny this teaching is that they are either attempting to apply human logic to the work of God or they are not focused on the right thing.  Many people try to but fail to reconcile how a loving God can choose some to live and others to die eternally.  Again, from Romans 9:23 Paul reminds us that this work is done for God’s glory and that logic need not apply in that we only need to be concerned with attributing all the glory to God as we are taught from the holy scriptures.  Remember, our faith does not rest on the wisdom (or logic) of this world (1 Cor. 2:5) but by the power of God which is shown fully through the patience, might, grace, and love brought about by the salvation of even one undeserving sinner who is completely unable to come to God and who is completely worthless to God on his own merit (Rom. 3:11-18).  If we are really, honestly focused on the truth of scripture with a desire to honor God there should be no issue in attributing the work of salvation fully to God and accepting what the scriptures teach about limited atonement.

I would like to make two other points before closing; one about scriptural interpretation and another on missions.

Scriptural Interpretation
As bible-believing Christians we hold to the inerrancy of scripture meaning we believe that every word of scripture is true and that scripture never contradicts itself.  Given that scripture itself is the only full proof, never failing source of truth we should always allow scripture to interpret scripture.  In discussing limited atonement and election the non-reformed third member of the party brought up John 3:16 which says:
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

The person made the point that this verse seems to teach that all persons anyone can be saved and that they can be saved by their own choice in that whoever means anyone and believes means to choose to believe.  When we come to issues such as this we must apply the easy verses to the more complex ones even when it seems as if they are contradictory knowing that scripture never contradicts itself.  When we read John 3:16 in light of Romans 9:15-24 and Romans 8:28-30 which teaches that only some are saved and that those who are saved are only saved by the work of God we are can only interpret John 3:16 as meaning those who are elected when saying whoever and that belief is a product of God, not ourselves acting on our own free-will.

Take for example Colossians 1:6 where Paul says the gospel has come to the whole world.  Does he really mean that the gospel has reached the whole world?  Well, lets look at Matthew 24:14 to see.  In Matt. 24:14 Jesus says that the end of the world will come when the gospel has reached the whole world.  So either the scriptures are contradictory in these two verses and we should pack our bags and go home or we should, and must, say that Paul is referring to the whole world simply as an exaggeration because if the gospel had truly reached the whole world Jesus’ second coming would have occurred already.  This is only an example of how to allow scripture to interpret scripture but it is an integrally important method to apply when approaching verses such as John 3:16 which seem to imply that man chooses God or that anyone can be saved.

Missions in Light of Election and Limited Atonement
Finally, the question everyone asks; if God has already chosen who will be saved then why bother risking my life to missions work to reach the lost if they are going to be saved anyway?  This is a very fatalistic view on the work of salvation and missions and is at its root a serious error in one’s view on salvation and missions.  The bottom line is that scripture teaches two things among many others.  One, that God is the only one who saves and that He only chooses some to be saved and two that we are to go out and share the gospel at all times to every tribe, tongue, and nation (Matthew 28:16-20).  It is again an issue of who are we as lowly sinners to question God’s commands as Paul addressed in Romans 9.

True faith bears fruit and a desire to want to serve and honor God (Colossians 1:6 and James).  How do we honor God? by keeping him commandments in humble obedience (Romans 16:26) and adhering to the truths we learn from scripture and desiring to reach the presently lost whom God has elected.  To lose motivation or a desire for missions in light of election and limited atonement reflects an incorrect view in one’s approach to the glory of God in that it reflects that they in some way want to have a part in the conversion of the lost and their salvation.  I say that one should be more driven to adhere to the great commission with a reformed doctrinal background because it is reassuring to know that scripture teaches that God has already done they work and they even though we were once worthless to God (Rom. 3:11) that He has now chosen us to work in the reaching of the lost when he Himself is completely capable of removing us from the picture and bringing out conversion from the elect.  Instead, He graciously allows us to serve in the work He has already completed by His power and grace to the glory of His name, Amen!

In conclusion, we must be willing at all times and in every way to humble ourselves to the teaching of scripture and to the glory of our God.  I pray that these words were not my own as a product of my own works, thoughts, or desires but only a result of the work of God in me.  I pray that this teaching was made humbly and that those who receive it would do so humbly and that God would soften their hearts to receive it.  I pray that these teachings are in accordance with the truth of scripture as the Lord of Hosts has revealed it to us and that His name ultimately is glorified in this work that He would be lifted up and praised as the Holy one for all eternity, AMEN!

10.02.06

Bible Study on Colossians - An Introduction

Posted in Uncategorized at 7:35 am by Perry

Colossians

Introduction:
Colossians is an epistle of the Apostle Paul written late in his ministry when he was imprisoned in Rome. The letter was written predominantly to gentile Christians of Colossae and Laodicea written in response to false teachers who had become prominent in the church. It is believed that the letter was written about the time of 60 - 62 A.D. only one to two years before Paul was martyred in Rome. The letter was written around the same time as the epistle Ephesians and the letter to Philemon to which Colossians shares many similarities in style and substance.
History:
(1) The Apostle Paul – Paul, the author of this letter, was an apostle of Jesus Christ who was integral in establishing the NT church by his ministry. Many of our most cherished doctrines (i.e. justification by faith and freedom from the law) were expounded by Paul in his epistles (letters). The bulk of the NT was written by Paul. As an apostle, Paul held the highest office among early believers along with the other apostles (the 12 disciples) who were personally called by Jesus Christ. Paul often felt compelled to defend his apostleship as he was the only apostle to be called by Jesus post-resurrection

(2) Paul’s Relation to Colossae – Paul himself had never been to the church at Colossae. Instead, the church had been planted through the ministry of Epaphras (Col. 1:7) at Colossae in the region of Phrygia. At the time that the letter was written, Paul was imprisoned in Rome in the final years of his life when he was either in prison or house arrest for openly preaching the gospel during the persecution of Nero or Dem. When Paul wrote the letter, it is believed that the church at Colossae was flourishing and growing rapidly.
(3) Purpose of the Letter – The letter to the Colossians was written by Paul in response to reports he had received, most likely from Epaphras, concerning the increasing popularity of false teachers within the church.  These false teachers were believed to have fallen into two camps, both of which were addressed by Paul in his letter. The first group of false teachers were Jewish zealots, or judaziers, who were attempting to integrate OT
laws and regulations into Christian doctrine (of which Paul addresses in Col. 2: 16-23). The second group were Jewish mystics who were introducing Gnostic teachings into orthodox Christian doctrine with heretical teachings concerning the deity of Christ (of which Paul addresses in Col. 2:6-15, 1:15-23) suggesting that Jesus was neither fully man nor fully God. Finally, Paul speaks extensively about his ministry and imprisonment (Col. 1:24 – 2:5) to encourage the believers.

Authorship:
It is believed by most orthodox Christians that the epistle to the church at Colossae was in fact written by the Apostle Paul but there are other biblical scholars who dispute this claim.
- Evidence Against Pauline Authorship
(a) External Evidence – there is no significant external evidence to support
an argument that Paul did not write the letter to Colossae. In fact,
external and not internal evidence provides the strongest support for
Pauline authorship.
(b) Internal Evidence – The two main arguments against Pauline authorship
are linguistic and theologically based. Some scholars suggests the
labored style of Colossians is not reflective of Paul’s writings and not
consistent with the conditions under which the letter was written (in
prison in response to heresy). Others suggests that the vocabulary used in
the letter is unique to this letter but one must remember Paul’s extended
education. Finally, some scholars suggest that the theology expounded
by Paul is again unique to Colossians but this view is not widely held and
is marginal.
- Evidence to Support Pauline Authorship
(a) External Evidence – The epistle was quoted by many writers of Paul’s time (Ignatius, Barnabas, Polycarp and Justin Martyr) quote from the epistle in their writings and attribute the work to the Apostle Paul. The epistle was included in both the Marcion canon and the Muratorian canon which were the first two canon’s of NT scripture.
(b) Internal Evidence – The linguistic style is very similar to the writing in Ephesians which is an epistle with undisputed authorship of Paul. The letter to the church as Colossae, though, has a much more labored format and structure reflective of both Paul’s old age and conditions of imprisonment at the time that this letter was written. Also, there are striking similarities not only to Ephesians but also Philemon in structure, format, vocabulary, and people mentioned in the body of the letter. Essentially, to deny Pauline authorship for Colossians, one must also deny his authorship for the letters to the Ephesians and to Philemon as the similarities are so striking.

 

Outline of Colossians:
I. Salutation (1:1-2)
II. Orthodoxy: The Sufficiency of Christ Explained (1:3–2:7)
  A. Thanksgiving and Prayer for the Colossians (1:3-14)
    1. Thanksgiving for the Colossians’ Faith (1:3-8)
    2. Prayer for the Colossians’ Knowledge and Growth (1:9-14)
  B. Hymn to Christ the Lord (1:15-20)
  C. Affirmation of Christ the Reconciler (1:21-23)
  D. Paul’s Commission concerning the Mystery of Christ (1:24–2:7)
    1. Paul’s Past Labors Aimed at Perfection in Christ (1:24-29)
    2. Paul’s Present Concern regarding Defection from Christ (2:1-7)
III. Heterodoxy: The Sufficiency of Christ Denied (2:8–3:4)
  A. The Sufficiency of Christ Restated (2:8-15)
    1. Statement against Heretics (2:8)
    2. Restatement of Christ’s Sufficiency (2:9-15)
      a. Christ our Authority (2:9-10)
      b. Christ our Power (2:11-12)
      c. Christ our Victor (2:13-15)
  B. The Colossians’ Practices as a Denial of the Sufficiency of Christ (2:16-19)
  C. The Colossians’ Practices as a Contradiction of Corporate Life in Christ (2:20–3:4)
    1. Death with Christ Means Death to Human Regulations (2:20-23)
    2. Resurrection with Christ Means New Perspective (3:1-4)
IV. Orthopraxy: The Sufficiency of Christ Experienced (3:5–4:6)
  A. Experienced Individually (3:5-17)
    1. Negative: Putting off the Old Man (3:5-11)
    2. Positive: Putting on the New Man (3:12-17)
  B. Experienced in the Home (3:18–4:1)
    1. Wives and Husbands (3:18-19)
    2. Children and Parents (3:20-21)
    3. Slaves and Masters (3:22–4:1)
  C. Experienced in Relation to Others (4:2-6)
    1. In Relation to Paul (4:2-4)
    2. In Relation to Unbelievers (4:5-6)
V. Final Greetings (4:7-18)
  A. Commendation of Tychicus (4:7-9)
  B. Greetings from Paul’s Co-Workers (4:10-14)
  C. Greetings from Paul (4:15-18)

 
NOTE: The outline of Colossians along with many of the arguments both for and against Pauline authorship were taken from Dr. Daniel Wallace’s “Introduction to Colossians”.

 

LINKS

Introduction, Argument, and Authorship - Dr. Daniel Wallace
John Calvin’s Commentary on Colossians - John Calvin
John Gill’s Commentary on Collosians - John Gill
Matthew Henry’s Concise Commentary on Colossians - Matthew Henry

KJV Only Debate

Posted in Uncategorized at 7:29 am by Perry

Why I Do Not Use The King James Version In Public Worship

Pastor Paul Orrick

In the past few years a strange movement has started up in some circles; The movement is the “King James Only” movement. Some are saying that the KJV is the only correct translation of the Bible. Some churches are even advertising themselves as a “King James Only Church”.

I am happy to tell you that the idea that the “King James Bible” is the only true translation of the Bible is not an issue in our church. In fact I do not use a KJV in public worship and will give you some of the reasons why I do not.

I Do not Like The Idea of a State Sponsored and Mandated Translation.
I want you to do some “roll playing” with me. I want you to pretend that you are a Baptist in England in the years 1611; the year the King James Bible was first issued.

Here are a couple of questions for you: What Bible are you using in your home in 1611? - What Bible does your pastor read at church on Sunday? - The answers may surprise you. - At home you have The Geneva Bible which was first published in 1560. At church your pastor will probably be reading from The Bishop’s Bible (1568) which was edited by Archbishop Matthew Parker.

Imagine that; Two translations of the English Bible in a Baptist Church, and neither of them is the King James Version. As much as 40 years later it will still be the same, and should you come to America you would find nothing but the Geneva Bible and The Bishops Bible.

The most popular Bible in 1611 and for many years after that was the Geneva Bible, NOT the King James. In 1620 the Pilgrims arrived at Plymouth with plans to establishing a new nation. The Bible under their arms was not the King James Version; It was the Geneva Bible.

_________________________________________________
Now lets talk about the man King James. James disapproved the use of the Geneva Bible for three reasons (1) The marginal notes in the Genevah Bible were clearly Calvinistic and James was a Catholic (2) Marginal notes in the Genevah Bible said that men and women were sometimes correct in disobeying the king’s orders – King James took this as a strike against his authority (3) The marginal notes in the Genevah Bible clearly identified the Anti-Christ as being the Pope of Rome, and James was a Catholic (Revelation 11:7)

Because of his hatred of the Geneva Bible, James ordered a new translation be created. The result was the King James Version of 1611

_____________________________
By the way, The same year that King James published his Bible he also burned a Baptist at the stake. The man’s name was Edward Wightman. He was a member of the church were Dr. John Gill was pastor. Wightman was arrested, accused of heresy before the Bishop of Coventry, and burned at the stake on April 11, 1611

____________________________

The King James Bible did not meet with acceptance. English speaking people already had the Geneva Bible and it was a Bible that they loved. In order to abolish the Geneva Bible and promote his own translation King James made it against the law to use any other Bible in England other than His Translation.

Think About It: What would you do if a president were elected who immediately ordered a new translation of the Bible be made in his name and then passed a law saying that no other Bibles could be read publicaly in the churchs of America?

Now you know one more reason why Puritans and Baptists left England to come to the free lands of America.

I Do Not Like Having To Translate English Into English
Pastors who use the King James Version are forced Sunday after Sunday to read and then translate the Bible from Old archaic English into the language of the people. We will always have to do some of that, but it is a crime to insist that people use a Bible that they cannot understand without a pastor’s help.

Here are a few examples of King James language which does not make since to 21st century readers:

For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted. Hebrews 2:18 (KJV)

For in that He Himself has suffered, being tempted, He is able to aid those who are tempted. Hebrews 2:18 (NKJV)

For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews’ religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it: Galatians 1:13 (KJV)

For you have heard of my former conduct in Judaism, how I persecuted the church of God beyond measure and tried to destroy it.

Galatians 1:13 (NKJV)

Therefore take no thought, saying, What shall we eat? or, What shall we drink? or, Wherewithal shall we be clothed? Matthew 6:31 (KJV)

“Therefore do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ Matthew 6:31 (NKJV)

For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. 1 Thess 4:15 (KJV)

For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord will by no means precede those who are asleep. 1 Thess 4:15 (NKJV)

But Simon’s wife’s mother lay sick of a fever, and anon they tell him of her. Mark 1:30 (KJV)

But Simon’s wife’s mother lay sick with a fever, and they told Him about her at once. Mark 1:30 (NKJV)

But he that received the seed into stony places, the same is he that heareth the word, and anon with joy receiveth it; Matthew 13:20 (KJV)

But he who received the seed on stony places, this is he who hears the word and immediately receives it with joy; Matthew 13:20 (NKJV)

And ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool: James 2:3 (KJV)

and you pay attention to the one wearing the fine clothes and say to him, “You sit here in a good place,” and say to the poor man, “You stand there,” or, “Sit here at my footstool,” James 2:3 (NKJV)

And her spirit came again, and she arose straightway: and he commanded to give her meat. Luke 8:55 (KJV)

Then her spirit returned, and she arose immediately. And He commanded that she be given something to eat. Luke 8:55 (NKJV)

When I was a boy I would regularly hear preachers preach against the Catholic church. One of the charges that they would level against the priests was that Catholic priests withheld the Bible from the common people. At that time all Catholic Churches conducted Mass in Latin, which the common people could not understand. Old Time Baptist preachers argued that this was done so that the Priest could “lord” their authority over the people

I have just shown you a number of passages in the King James Bible which most Americans cannot understand. This is but a small sample.

Are “King James Only” preachers assuming the same role that Priests of the Latin church assumed? Do they love having it that way?

Jesus Christ Used a Translation of The Bible and Ordered Us To Make More of Them.

In 400 B.C. The Old Testament was translated into Aramaic. This was done because many Jews lost their Hebrew during the Babylonian captivity and could only read and converse in Aramaic. Aramaic was a common language in the Palestine of Jesus’ day, and the Aramaic translations was in use then.

In 250 B.C. The Old testament was translated from Hebrew and Aramaic into Greek. This translation is known as the Septuagint. It is sometimes designated with the Roman numeral LXX (70) because it is believed that 70 – 72 translators did the work of translating. Greek speaking people in the Palestine of Jesus’ day would have known the Scriptures as they came to them from the LXX.

Jesus and His disciples would have used these two translations, and there is evidence of both in the New Testament writings of the Apostles.

Imagine that; Two translations of the Old Testament in use in the early church and neither of them is the King James Version.

In Matthew 28: Jesus gave us these instructions:

“All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Matthew 28:18-20
To fulfill this commission we must make many different translations of the Bible. We must see to it that the Bible can be read and understood by the common people of every nation. This means that we not only translate the Bible, but that we from time to time “Update” the language so that common people who read it will be able to understand what it says.

People who insist that the KJV is the only true English translation are failing to fulfill our Lord’s directions in the Great Commission. They are insisting that the common people must not be allowed to read the Bible in their own language. This “smells” of Popery to me.

In the year 1428 a company of men were commissioned by the Pope to travel to the burial place of John Wycliffe. Once there they were to exhume his body (which had been in the grave 44 years) Burn it to ashes, and spread the ashes in the river so that his memory would be erased from the minds of the English people.

Wycliffe’s crime was that he had translated the Bible into the language of the common people. Wycliffe’s dream came true; The plow boys of England could read the Bible in their own language.

Modern translators of the Bible have followed the steps of Wycliffe; They have devoted themselves to getting the Bible into the language of the common people. Sad to say, there are still those who oppose such works and demand that common people read and listen to a form of English that they do not speak and often do not understand.
Amen